Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Lawsuit by Flight Attendants Fired Over Religious Objections to Equality Act Support
A Ninth Circuit ruling allows two former Alaska Airlines employees to proceed with their religious discrimination claims against the airline and their union.
Media·

A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit initiated by two former flight attendants against Alaska Airlines, asserting they were terminated due to their religious beliefs. The employees had voiced objections to the airline's endorsement of the Equality Act, leading to their dismissal.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on Wednesday, determining there is adequate evidence for a jury to assess whether Lacey Smith and Marli Brown's dismissals were a direct result of their religious convictions. This decision allows their legal challenge against the airline to move forward.
Background of the Dispute
The controversy originated in early 2021 when Alaska Airlines announced its support for the proposed Equality Act on an internal online platform accessible to employees. The Equality Act, championed by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, aimed to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identity as protected categories under federal civil rights legislation concerning employment, housing, and other areas. The bill successfully passed the House of Representatives in February 2021.
The airline invited employees to share their thoughts and comments on the online forum. During this discussion, Lacey Smith posted a question asking, "As a company, do you think it’s possible to regulate morality?" Concurrently, Marli Brown submitted a comment articulating her deeply held religious convictions, suggesting that the Equality Act could negatively impact women, girls, and individuals of faith.
Following these remarks on the company's internal forum, both Smith and Brown faced investigations and were subsequently fired from their positions. Alaska Airlines characterized their comments as "discriminatory," "hateful," and "offensive."
Legal Challenge Proceeds
Stephanie Taub, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, which represents Smith and Brown and argued their case before the court in August 2025, expressed satisfaction with the appellate court's decision.
"We are grateful the court recognized the clear evidence of religious discrimination against Marli and Lacey by both Alaska Airlines and the flight attendants’ union," Taub stated. "The Ninth Circuit’s decision today reinforces that federal civil rights laws protect people of faith from discrimination by their employer or their union. You cannot be fired because your employer does not like your religious beliefs."
The ruling underscores the protection afforded to individuals of faith under federal civil rights statutes, ensuring that employment decisions are not based on an employer's disapproval of an employee's religious beliefs.
Related Stories

Alaska Senator Condemns Alleged Ballot Scheme as "Scandal of the Highest Order"
Senator Dan Sullivan labeled an alleged ballot scheme by Representative Mary Peltola's campaign and Democratic strategists a "scandal of the highest order." The reported effort aimed to confuse Alaskan voters with two
Oct 29

Democratic Strategist Dismisses Alaska Ballot Controversy as Common Political Tactic
Democratic strategist Adrienne Elrod downplayed recent allegations regarding an effort to influence Alaska's Senate race, comparing it to historical political tactics. She suggested such maneuvers are common, drawing
Oct 29

Portland Public Schools Lifts Ban on Mother Who Challenged Gender Identity Curriculum
Portland Public Schools has reversed its decision to ban an Oregon mother from school grounds after she filed a lawsuit. The district also agreed to exempt her children from certain LGBTQ2SIA+-related curriculum,
Oct 28

Jack Antonoff Rebukes Ed Sheeran for Macklemore Removal, Citing 'Massive' Missed Opportunity
Grammy-winning producer Jack Antonoff slammed Ed Sheeran for removing Macklemore from his tour after pro-Palestine remarks. Antonoff argued Sheeran should have canceled the tour and played free concerts, asserting
Oct 28